Today is Pi Day. So along with the Alamo and the Maine, remember the pi.
π r²
But as a friend once told me, "Pie are not square; pie are round. Cornbread are square."
3.1415926535897932384626433832795028841971693993751058209749445923078 164062862089986280348253421170679821480865132823066470938446095505822 317253594081284811174502841027019385211055596446229489549303819644288 109756659334461284756482337867831652712019091456485669234603486104543 266482133936072602491412737245870066063155881748815209209628292540917 15364367892590360011330530548820466521384146951941511609...How's that for a pi in the face? All hail, the mighty PI.
However, there is seldom need for anything more than 3.14159; or even 3.1416, if we round. Every really real circular object can be measured to a specific number of decimal places, and so the ratio C/d will always be a rational number, no matter how many decimals are in our instrument. So what is this "irrational" pi anyway but a pure spirit, not found anywhere in the real world? Hunh? Credulous believers in PI even call it "irrational," but "rationalists" know there is no such thing in reality. A fig for your pi.
There is apparently a movement afoot to replace π with 2π in radial formulae, calling it τ (tau). There is a certain elegance in notation in trig if you do this. Unfortunately, the area of the circle becomes τd²/8 (or τ r²/2 if you prefer), which is not so elegant. The circumference of a circle is 2π r, which would be τ r. So τ is the ratio of the circumference to the radius (C/r) while π is the ratio of the circumference to the diameter (C/r) or the ratio of the area to the squared radius (A/r²). Notationally, tau may simplify linear formulae while pi makes more elegance dealing with square formulae. Perhaps we should define a number for V/r³.
No comments:
Post a Comment