Reviews

A beautifully told story with colorful characters out of epic tradition, a tight and complex plot, and solid pacing. -- Booklist, starred review of On the Razor's Edge

Great writing, vivid scenarios, and thoughtful commentary ... the stories will linger after the last page is turned. -- Publisher's Weekly, on Captive Dreams

Friday, August 2, 2013

LULZ!

The New York Times is running a "guess the quote" game:

How Recent Popes Differ on Key Issues

Choose the pope who said each quote on seven critical issues.

where "key issue" means "an issue that gets the NYT editorial board hot and bothered."  (Hint: none are labeled as concerning Manicheanism or Transubstantiation or the Apostolic Succession.)  Unsurprisingly, two of the six "issues" are pelvic.  The sequence of the "issues" is also revealing of NYT priorities. 

However, TOF is unsure whether the quiz proves the ostensible point.  It depends on how clueless the NYT people are.   See what you think.  Perceptive TOFians should get high marks based on form rather than matter. 

6 comments:

  1. I did pretty well - but I cheated a little by some familiarity with their different ways with language.

    Btw, I'm returning to Sci-fi reading after a long absence. I like *Eifelheim*, but am otherwise quite out of touch with the science fiction of the last fifteen years. I've moved, and ended up next to Tacoma Used Books, a veritable crack-den of sci-fi and fantasy, and for a quarter am ploughing through a fat collection of Asimov's Hugo Winners.

    Chris-Kirk

    ReplyDelete
  2. If by ostensible point you mean whether the popes differ, I think these quotes show remarkable unity between all three. Perhaps the headline should have been how they agree on key issues.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Either the NYT was serious and was wishfully reading between various line, or the headline was meant to be ironic and to point out how behind the popular wisdom the Church is.

      Delete
    2. I was thinking the same thing.

      I'm not Catholic, so I only did okay; got a few right, a few wrong. But throughout I was struggling to find any, you know, differences among them, as was promised in the headline of the piece.

      Sure, there were a few differences in tone and style. But the substance of their words was largely consistent. It's almost as if -- gasp! -- Catholic teaching hasn't really changed.

      Delete
    3. Interesting slide from what the popes say to what the Catholic Church teaches. The NYT and other intellectually/doctrinally challenged entities seem to think that the Church teaches what the Pope says. It never occurs to them that the Pope might say what the Church teaches.

      Delete
    4. The NYT and other intellectually/doctrinally challenged entities seem to think that the Church teaches what the Pope says. It never occurs to them that the Pope might say what the Church teaches.

      I think that may be because the NYT and other entities are used to looking at everything through the prism of American power politics. A new president, for example, can bring radical shifts in the policies and statements of the government -- and they mistakenly apply that thinking to the Catholic Church as well.

      When an American president wins an election, he claims a "mandate" to make sweeping changes. When a pope is elected, it seems like more of a humble acceptance to merely preach what the Church has already established. And that leaves the media befuddled.

      Anyway, that's just this non-Catholic's opinion.

      Delete

Whoa, What's This?

adam amateur theology Aquinas argument from motion Aristotelianism art atheism autumn of the modern ages books brains breaking news captive dreams cartoon charts chieftain clannafhloinn comix commentary counterattack crusades culcha dogheads easton stuff economics eifelheim evolution factoids on parade fake news fallen angels Feeders fir trees in lungs firestar flicks floods flynncestry flynnstuff forecasts forest of time fun facts gandersauce gimlet eye global warming glvwg headlines henchmen high frontier history home front how to lie with statistics humor hush-hush hypatia in the house of submission irish Iron Shirts irrationalism january dancer jihad journeyman kabuki kool letter lion's mouth lunacon maps mayerling medieval metrology miscellany modern mythology moose zombies music new years nexus odds odds and ends paleofuture passing of the modern age philosophy philosophy math poetry politics psyched out! public service quality quiet sun quote of the day razor's edge redefinition of marriage religio reviews river of stars scandal science science marches on scientism scrivening shipwrecks of time shroud skiffy skiffy in the news skools slipping masks some people will believe anything stats stories stranger things the auld curmudgeon the madness continues the new fascism the spiral arm the writing life thomism thread o' years tofspot topology untergang des abendlandes untergang des morgenlandes up jim river video clips vignettes war on science we get letters we're all gonna die whimsy words at play xmas you can't make this stuff up