That any two things in the universe are connected can be demonstrated inductively by the magic of Google. It is not necessary that to be computationally tractable a process must be informationally encapsulated. Take any two words. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy uses "banana" and "mandolin" in an article on the Frame Problem. If you google it, you obtain 2,690,000 hits.
So I tried "melancholy" + "eels" and obtained 3,090,000 hits, including unlikely poetry precisely imagining melancholy eels, at a site yclept poetry-of-despair.
Then I tried "elephant" + "petunia" only to discover that there is a plant called an elephant petunia along with 3,570,000 other hits.
Then I opened the dictionary at random and got "theosophy" + "hemorrhage." This yielded a mere 71,300 hits, including those with "theosophist" (at least one of whom appears to have died of a hemorrhage) and "theosophical."
Then "canthus" (the corners where the upper and lower eyelids meet) + "deliverance." After quote-enclosing "canthus" to avoid the homonymous "can thus," I obtained 4,240 freaking hits and learned that surgical management of carcinomas at the inner canthus involves rotation and deliverance of the flap under the glabellar skin.
Even "unobtainium" + "maple" harvested 45,300 hits.
Your task, my devoted henchmen, is to explore this phenomenon yourselves.
The OFloinn's random thoughts on science fiction, philosophy, statistical analysis, sundry miscellany, and the Untergang des Abendlandes
Reviews
A beautifully told story with colorful characters out of epic tradition, a tight and complex plot, and solid pacing. -- Booklist, starred review of On the Razor's Edge
Great writing, vivid scenarios, and thoughtful commentary ... the stories will linger after the last page is turned. -- Publisher's Weekly, on Captive Dreams
Great writing, vivid scenarios, and thoughtful commentary ... the stories will linger after the last page is turned. -- Publisher's Weekly, on Captive Dreams
Friday, August 26, 2011
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Whoa, What's This?
adam
amateur theology
anthropology
aphorisms
Aquinas
argument from motion
Aristotelianism
art
atheism
autumn of the modern ages
books
brains
breaking news
captive dreams
cartoon
charts
chieftain
clannafhloinn
comix
commentary
counterattack
crusades
culcha
dogheads
easton stuff
economics
eifelheim
evolution
factoids on parade
fake news
fallen angels
Feeders
fir trees in lungs
firestar
flicks
floods
flynncestry
flynnstuff
forecasts
forest of time
fun facts
gandersauce
gimlet eye
global warming
glvwg
headlines
henchmen
high frontier
history
home front
how to lie with statistics
humor
Hunters Moon
hush-hush
hypatia
in the house of submission
irish
Iron Shirts
irrationalism
january dancer
jihad
journeyman
kabuki
kool
letter
lion's mouth
lunacon
maps
mayerling
medieval
metrology
miscellany
modern mythology
moose zombies
music
new years
nexus
odds
odds and ends
paleofuture
passing of the modern age
philosophy
philosophy math
poetry
politics
potpourri
psyched out!
public service
quality
quiet sun
quote of the day
razor's edge
redefinition of marriage
religio
reviews
river of stars
scandal
science
science marches on
scientism
scrivening
shipwrecks of time
shroud
skiffy
skiffy in the news
skools
slipping masks
some people will believe anything
stats
stories
stranger things
the auld curmudgeon
the madness continues
the new fascism
the russians are coming
the spiral arm
the writing life
thomism
thought for the day
thread o' years
tofspot
topology
untergang des abendlandes
untergang des morgenlandes
up jim river
video clips
vignettes
war on science
we get letters
we're all gonna die
whimsy
words at play
wuv
xmas
you can't make this stuff up
That reminds me of an article G.K. Chesterton wrote for the Illustrated London News in 1906 (February 17, "The Dangers of Metaphor") in which he did a similar experiment. As he stated near the beginning of the article:
ReplyDeleteMy trouble is that I never can really feel that there is such a thing as a different subject. There is no such thing as an irrelevant thing in the universe; for all things in the universe are at least relevant to the universe. It is my psychological disease...that I can never see disconnected things without connecting them together in a train of thought. I have just been glancing down the columns of a newspaper to find matter for my new shortened paragraphs. I try to pick out different subjects, and even as I do so my mind weaves them mechanically into the same subject. I carefully take four things from the paper, and even as I take them, they turn into one thing.
chreode periscope
ReplyDeleteNext best I can do is:
ReplyDeletefuligin pellucidar
without thankfulness,connectedness in unimaginable,,>>
ReplyDeletegedeprama|bellofpeace.org