Judy Curry's website Climate Etc. has comm box posts by someone named Mike Flynn. Be advised that this is not TOF. About a week or so ago, our local paper featured a letter to the editor signed by "Mike Flynn" that was likewide non-TOFian. What is going on here? A plethora of Mike Flynns? Or did the Michael Flynn Manufacturing Company put out one last shipment? An entire company for producing Michael Flynns? No wonder they went into liquidation. Lack of demand.
Not as high-power as Kress or as widespread as Resnick, nor so wheeler-dealer as Haldeman.
The OFloinn's random thoughts on science fiction, philosophy, statistical analysis, sundry miscellany, and the Untergang des Abendlandes
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Teo
Teodorq sunna Nagarajan has joined an expedition tasked with evaluating the"serving tray" as a suitable observation post for the...
-
Previously: Part 8, Trial and Error From Plausible to Proven The great dishonesty of Galileo’s Dialogue was to present a contes...
-
M e morial Day was a day set apart to honor the dead of the Civil War; and so TOF thought it fitting to mention a veteran of that war, o...
-
I was mulling over some favorite tunes, and decided to make me a list. It soon grew faster than a politician's spending. Herewith, said...
Perhaps the Michael Flynn manufacturing company needed a better quality-control person on staff.
ReplyDeleteSomeone with multiple levels of expertise on the subject.
What do you think of this:
ReplyDeletehttp://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/scientists-use-computer-to-mathematically-prove-goedel-god-theorem-a-928668.html
paper is linked here http://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/scientists-use-computer-to-mathematically-prove-goedel-god-theorem-a-928668.html
You think this is just a headline grabbing attn?
Goedel's ontological proof could not have been kept too much a secret, given that Wikipedia had an entry on it:
Deletehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G%C3%B6del%27s_ontological_proof
Sorry second link is a pdf of the scientific paper in question and first url does not have a link
ReplyDelete