TOF once listened to a discussion between Stan Schmidt, then editor of hard SF mag ANALOG, and George Scithers, then-editor of fantasy-horror mag WEIRD TALES. George told Stan that he did not think it was possible to write a story that would be acceptable to both Analog and Weird Tales.
TOF took this as a sort of challenge and wrote the story that appears today on the PREVIEW page: "Dragons." It is a story based on ecological predator-prey ratios and, well, read it. I sent it to Stan who said he would have bought it save that he had just bought another story with a similar theme (sic!) So we sent it to George, who bought it, thus demonstrating that it was possible to write a story acceptable to both mags. Although somewhat off the median in both cases. Heh.
The OFloinn's random thoughts on science fiction, philosophy, statistical analysis, sundry miscellany, and the Untergang des Abendlandes
Reviews
A beautifully told story with colorful characters out of epic tradition, a tight and complex plot, and solid pacing. -- Booklist, starred review of On the Razor's Edge
Great writing, vivid scenarios, and thoughtful commentary ... the stories will linger after the last page is turned. -- Publisher's Weekly, on Captive Dreams
Great writing, vivid scenarios, and thoughtful commentary ... the stories will linger after the last page is turned. -- Publisher's Weekly, on Captive Dreams
Thursday, July 31, 2014
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Whoa, What's This?
adam
amateur theology
anthropology
aphorisms
Aquinas
argument from motion
Aristotelianism
art
atheism
autumn of the modern ages
books
brains
breaking news
captive dreams
cartoon
charts
chieftain
clannafhloinn
comix
commentary
counterattack
crusades
culcha
dogheads
easton stuff
economics
eifelheim
evolution
factoids on parade
fake news
fallen angels
Feeders
fir trees in lungs
firestar
flicks
floods
flynncestry
flynnstuff
forecasts
forest of time
fun facts
gandersauce
gimlet eye
global warming
glvwg
headlines
henchmen
high frontier
history
home front
how to lie with statistics
humor
Hunters Moon
hush-hush
hypatia
in the house of submission
irish
Iron Shirts
irrationalism
january dancer
jihad
journeyman
kabuki
kool
letter
lion's mouth
lunacon
maps
mayerling
medieval
metrology
miscellany
modern mythology
moose zombies
music
new years
nexus
odds
odds and ends
paleofuture
passing of the modern age
philosophy
philosophy math
poetry
politics
potpourri
psyched out!
public service
quality
quiet sun
quote of the day
razor's edge
redefinition of marriage
religio
reviews
river of stars
scandal
science
science marches on
scientism
scrivening
shipwrecks of time
shroud
skiffy
skiffy in the news
skools
slipping masks
some people will believe anything
stats
stories
stranger things
the auld curmudgeon
the madness continues
the new fascism
the russians are coming
the spiral arm
the writing life
thomism
thought for the day
thread o' years
tofspot
topology
untergang des abendlandes
untergang des morgenlandes
up jim river
video clips
vignettes
war on science
we get letters
we're all gonna die
whimsy
words at play
wuv
xmas
you can't make this stuff up
Years ago I taught a course that included making computer models of various situations. As an example, I put together a model I called Foxes, Rabbits and Grass. Grass grows at an autonomous rate (I ignored weather), and is eaten by rabbits at a rate proportional to the number of rabbits. Rabbits multiply at a rate proportional to their numbers, minus those eaten by foxes and minus those who starve if grass is inadequate. Foxes eat rabbits and grow at a rate proportional to their numbers, the number of rabbits available as food, and minus those who starve if there aren't enough rabbits. I put quite a bit of effort into trying to get the rates in reasonable accord with reality. It was interesting to see the way the various populations could crash if one or another got too large (usually because of initial conditions).
ReplyDelete