The OFloinn's random thoughts on science fiction, philosophy, statistical analysis, sundry miscellany, and the Untergang des Abendlandes
Reviews
A beautifully told story with colorful characters out of epic tradition, a tight and complex plot, and solid pacing. -- Booklist, starred review of On the Razor's Edge
Great writing, vivid scenarios, and thoughtful commentary ... the stories will linger after the last page is turned. -- Publisher's Weekly, on Captive Dreams
Great writing, vivid scenarios, and thoughtful commentary ... the stories will linger after the last page is turned. -- Publisher's Weekly, on Captive Dreams
Thursday, September 24, 2015
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Whoa, What's This?
adam
amateur theology
anthropology
aphorisms
Aquinas
argument from motion
Aristotelianism
art
atheism
autumn of the modern ages
books
brains
breaking news
captive dreams
cartoon
charts
chieftain
clannafhloinn
comix
commentary
counterattack
crusades
culcha
dogheads
easton stuff
economics
eifelheim
evolution
factoids on parade
fake news
fallen angels
Feeders
fir trees in lungs
firestar
flicks
floods
flynncestry
flynnstuff
forecasts
forest of time
fun facts
gandersauce
gimlet eye
global warming
glvwg
headlines
henchmen
high frontier
history
home front
how to lie with statistics
humor
Hunters Moon
hush-hush
hypatia
in the house of submission
irish
Iron Shirts
irrationalism
january dancer
jihad
journeyman
kabuki
kool
letter
lion's mouth
lunacon
maps
mayerling
medieval
metrology
miscellany
modern mythology
moose zombies
music
new years
nexus
odds
odds and ends
paleofuture
passing of the modern age
philosophy
philosophy math
poetry
politics
potpourri
psyched out!
public service
quality
quiet sun
quote of the day
razor's edge
redefinition of marriage
religio
reviews
river of stars
scandal
science
science marches on
scientism
scrivening
shipwrecks of time
shroud
skiffy
skiffy in the news
skools
slipping masks
some people will believe anything
stats
stories
stranger things
the auld curmudgeon
the madness continues
the new fascism
the russians are coming
the spiral arm
the writing life
thomism
thought for the day
thread o' years
tofspot
topology
untergang des abendlandes
untergang des morgenlandes
up jim river
video clips
vignettes
war on science
we get letters
we're all gonna die
whimsy
words at play
wuv
xmas
you can't make this stuff up
How is that a gotcha question? He answered a vague, dumb, meaningless question with a vague, dumb, meaningless answer. As he should. What does that even mean?
ReplyDeleteAn economically stated, if dumb, question gets a long, gear-grinding, clutch-slipping, can-i-get-this-thing-moving? reply with, if possible, even less intelligible content than the question. And as the engine coughs and stalls out, he calls out some guy in a hat?
DeleteEven by the low, low bar of American political discourse, that's a fail.
I would suggest, however, that the more superficially coherent replies of Saunders are more insidious, the 'how can we even talk about X when children in America are going hungry?' type of evasion. Saunders is worse than your standard social and economic illiterate - he's a social and economic buffoon convinced he understands it better than anybody else, and, unfortunately, has honed his soundbites accordingly. And some folks with more than one synapse to call their own fall for it, just like other-inclined but equally impassioned fruit-flies fall fro Trump.
American Democracy: insuring we get the leadership we deserve for 200+ years.
An economically stated, if dumb, question gets a long, gear-grinding, clutch-slipping, can-i-get-this-thing-moving? reply with, if possible, even less intelligible content than the question. And as the engine coughs and stalls out, he calls out some guy in a hat?
DeleteEven by the low, low bar of American political discourse, that's a fail.
But it's not. Trump needed to make sure people were positive towards him. What he did might sound bad when reading the quote back later, but evidently it worked. He certainly had no good reason to answer the "question", such as it was.
Either way, I don't see this as anything close to a "gotcha". It's more like an irrelevancy.
Trump has said repeatedly that he will 'bring back the American dream'. It is hardly a 'gotcha' to ask him what he means by that.
DeleteA 'gotcha' question would be something like 'do you know the name of the French minister of defense?'
Then perhaps instead of cherry-picking the answer to one question, we should look at the times he actually did clarify things:
ReplyDelete"Our country is in serious trouble. We don't have victories anymore," said Trump to an enthusiastic crowd in Trump Tower, "The U.S. has become a dumping ground for everyone else's problems."
"Our country needs a truly great leader – and we need a truly great leader now," he said. "We need a leader that can bring back our jobs, can bring back our manufacturing, can bring back our military – can take care of our vets..."
"The fact is, the American Dream is dead – but if I win, I will bring it back bigger and better and stronger than ever before," he declared.
http://www.truthrevolt.org/news/trump-american-dream-dead-i-will-bring-it-back
It's a complex question. Let's wait for a sound-bite answer then?
Lots of soundbites in his proclamations, that's for sure: platitudes and rah-rah. Okay for a rally, I suppose, but a little short on specifics. What does he think the American Dream is? Why does he think it is dead? How does he propose to "bring it back" from the dead? In what way does he propose it will be "better" and "stronger"? He who lives by the vague generality will die by the vague generality.
DeleteEurope went looking for "Leaders" in the 1930s. They too thought that a "Leader" could bring back the past, create jobs, and the like. But what does this guy know about manufacturing? He's a real estate wheeler-dealer. At least Perot knew something about production.
Okay, you don't think what he does will work. But what you said was that it wasn't unfair to ask what he meant by that, and I pointed out that he did say what he meant like that.
DeleteCherry-picking soundbites, and expecting him to answer a vague question within, like, 30 seconds to a minute, is unfair.
You're wrong on this one. He has answered what was asked, just not in this specific quote. You want to know more details about it, which is fine, but this is hardly a gotcha. It's an irrelevancy.
It's not that we don't think what he does will work, it's that he hasn't actually said he's going to do anything. "A leader that can bring back our jobs, can bring back our manufacturing, can bring back our military"—how, how, and how? By protectionism that's about as obsolete as luminiferous aether?
Delete"Bring back our jobs, manufacturing, and military" is a mission statement, it's not a plan to accomplish the mission.
To be fair, the "red hat" thing at the end is just saying "next question—by the way, sir, nice hat".
ReplyDeleteMaybe he meant to imply that Linux was the way to bring back the American Dream?
DeleteMaybe he meant to imply that Linux was the way to bring back the American Dream?
Delete